View this release
Alternative links
I am disappointed but not surprised that ATF is once again attempting to infringe on our rights, by publishing a ban on pistol braces, as seen here. The time is approaching where the rule comes into play. There are facts that are indisputable here, such as the ATF not having the authority to do so, as they are not allowed to create nor interpret these laws. The supreme court has even made rulings that have consequences for their very existence. They enforce laws which do not exist, but that does not make the threat they pose any less severe. They will use force to impose these laws upon us, and they will find themselves to have done nothing wrong when it comes time for the law to hold them accountable.
The best scenario is mass non-compliance. Take them for the joke they are. They will lose any case they put forth, and they will lose any fight they start.
This is a mould I was working on to produce an M16 alike brace. The brace fits a standard rifle buffer. The brace is the same length as an M16 stock. The M16s stock achieves a length of pull of roughly 13" which falls within the 13.5" maximum for a pistol brace. Previously any brace that did not have a length of pull over 13.5" and did not have a flat buttpad designed to be shouldered was legal. Keep in mind also that the 13.5" rule is also not a real law passed by congress but something they came up with, and in secret. They tried to charge a man with this secret never before seen rule and were laughed out of the courtroom, thankfully so or we would not know of the existence of this 'law'. They tried and failed to have records sealed as well.
This mould contains an external half, and two plugs that create the holes in the brace for the arm hole and buffer tube. I have never made an item like this, and this mould will probably need modification. I have included a .step assembly file. This project was put on the backburner some time ago, but as time runs out I am throwing every resource I have out there. I believe this brace could be printed if a soft enough flexible filament was used.
LBRY Tags: brace; ar15; pistol; stubbs; m16
The best scenario is mass non-compliance. Take them for the joke they are. They will lose any case they put forth, and they will lose any fight they start.
This is a mould I was working on to produce an M16 alike brace. The brace fits a standard rifle buffer. The brace is the same length as an M16 stock. The M16s stock achieves a length of pull of roughly 13" which falls within the 13.5" maximum for a pistol brace. Previously any brace that did not have a length of pull over 13.5" and did not have a flat buttpad designed to be shouldered was legal. Keep in mind also that the 13.5" rule is also not a real law passed by congress but something they came up with, and in secret. They tried to charge a man with this secret never before seen rule and were laughed out of the courtroom, thankfully so or we would not know of the existence of this 'law'. They tried and failed to have records sealed as well.
This mould contains an external half, and two plugs that create the holes in the brace for the arm hole and buffer tube. I have never made an item like this, and this mould will probably need modification. I have included a .step assembly file. This project was put on the backburner some time ago, but as time runs out I am throwing every resource I have out there. I believe this brace could be printed if a soft enough flexible filament was used.
LBRY Tags: brace; ar15; pistol; stubbs; m16